POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
ISA claims hundreds of thousands have wiped out their retirement balances
Hundreds of thousands of young Australians have wiped out their retirement balances under the government’s early release of super scheme, according to Industry Super Australia (ISA).
In a new analysis of the early release scheme released today, ISA said it estimated 395,000 people aged under 35 had eroded their superannuation balances, justifying fears the scheme could lead to a future generation left languishing on the pension.
“ISA estimates that about 480,000 Australians across all age groups could have wiped out their super, even before the second tranche opens,” it said. “In March the government broke open super’s preservation rules and allowed Australians who had lost their jobs or had hours reduced to access $10,000 in super and a further $10,000 from 1 July.”
ISA said that it had initiated the research following “calls from a noisy group of backbench MPs to dump the incremental and legislated increase to the super rate from 9.5 per cent to 12 per cent by 2025”.
“But if those MPs get their way more workers would be more reliant on the aged pension - a bill everyone pays through higher taxes,” ISA said.
ISA said its analysis was based on ATO data on the proportions by age of those with accounts below $10,000, and Treasury statistics on the age distribution of early release. Estimates have been updated to the 14 June APRA totals.
“On average about 15% of Australian workers have accessed their super early. Three states were above the national average - Queensland at 20%, Northern Territory 19% and Western Australia 16%.
ISA said industry Funds had supported this scheme’s intent to get cash to those in dire financial need and had already helped more than 1.4 million Australians tap into their super but noted there had been “troubling reports of super being used to gamble, buy alcohol or other types of discretionary spending”.
“As the second tranche of the early release scheme opens ISA is renewing calls for members to only access their super as a last resort. A 25-year-old taking out $10,000 now could have $49,000 less in retirement, a 35-year-old could have lost up to $34,000 and a 45-year-old up to $23,000.”
“The government estimated 1.65 million would take out $27 billion from super, but already 2.1 million have taken out at least $15 billion and it appears likely demand will far surpass forecasts. Despite the greater numbers, Industry Funds have prepared to deal with the demands of this scheme.”
“The Prime Minister and Treasurer must stick by their promise to increase the super rate because its critical to helping these people rebuild savings they’ve wiped out, and avoid tax hikes on working people to prop up more people drawing a full pension.”
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
I am guessing "wiped out" means reduced the super balance down to $Nil. That means the most this cohort withdrew was $10,000. What type of luxurious retirement was the $10,000 supposed to deliver?
If people were able to dip into their super earlier for extreme unexpected events like involuntary unemployment (such as the current measure) it would likely lead to greater engagement with their Super from younger members. Instead of making some negative statement on how this is eroding people's retirements the ISA should be putting a positive spin on how many of their members they have been able to help in their time of need.
Don't make me laugh.
The ISA is only concerned above the fees they will lose.