ISA finds Budget super measures lacking

10 May 2018
| By Hannah |
image
image
expand image

Despite superannuation coming up in the Federal Budget for the eleventh year running, Industry Super Australia (ISA) has hit out at the Government for failing to tackle unpaid superannuation or close the gender super gap by not re-investing the savings made by other Budget super measures.

Last night’s Budget revealed that the Government will gain $1.615 billion from three super measures, which would see default insurance turned off for younger members, more inactive accounts consolidated to the tax office, and rules tightened for tax deductions on personal contributions.

ISA director of public affairs, Matthew Linden, said that while these changes were justified, the Government failed to address “equally if not more urgent issues”.

“The Government is right to prioritise the erosion of small super balances – particularly for younger workers. A number of industry super funds have already taken steps to change insurance coverage for younger members.

“However, it is disappointing the surprisingly large Budget savings from the measures are not being used to fix unpaid superannuation or close the gender super gap. Rather than pocket the $1.6 billion in savings it should have been be used to abolish the $450 super threshold, pay super on parental leave, and align the payment of super and wages.”

Linden said that these “simply policy steps alone” would ensure that millions of Australians receive super entitlements who are currently missing out on them, especially women.

Women’s super balances lagged males’ overall by 40 per cent, while there are over three million Australians who missed out on an average of $2,000 a year in unpaid super.

ISA also said that super funds needed to ensure the balance protection measures announced last night did not have unintended adverse consequences for fund members.

Linden pointed to the possibility that the insurance changes would impact risk pooling and lead to higher premiums for other members as an example.

“Funds will need to work proactively to ensure that members who should retain insurance, including for instance those on parental leave, don’t lose important cover,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 15 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 15 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 16 hours ago