POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Keeping ‘best interests duty’ could protect super fund members: AIST
If safe harbour provisions are removed, the existing ‘best interests duty’ could ensure super fund members are not taken advantage of, according to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).
Voicing support for super funds providing advice to its members, AIST senior policy manager David Haynes pointed out that some of the proposals in the Quality of Advice Review required “fleshing out”.
“Firstly, the existing ‘best interests duty’ might provide more protections than the ‘good advice’ obligation proposed by Michelle Levy, particularly if the existing safe harbour provisions are removed,” he said.
“Secondly, the people who provide personal advice in contact centres are going to need to meet minimum standards.
“We’re waiting on the Government to announce the consultation on the review’s recommendations, so there will be plenty of opportunity for discussion about these issues.
“The Government has said they are not going to be having a review of a review, but it will be interesting to see if they intend to consider and progress all of the recommendations at the same time, or if they opt for a staged approach — my money is on the latter”.
Still, the review had addressed a lot of problems facing access to advice and its affordability, Haynes acknowledged.
Among one of the most welcomed proposals was the decision to do away with statement of advice (SOA) requirements.
“This should help contact centres and super fund websites to be able to both answer a wider range of members’ questions and to be able to do so without getting bogged down in paperwork”, Haynes said.
He added that providing advice could be enhanced by broadening the scope to provide intra-fund advice i.e. limited advice that is ‘collectively-charged’ built into the administration fee.
With the slew of proposed changes in the pipeline for the super system apart from the review, such as the defining the objective of super and increasing the concessional tax rate on super balances over $3 million, the AIST believed there were some significant challenges ahead.
Hayne explained: “In terms of what this range of changes could mean for funds, there will be more engaging call centres, more dynamic use of websites, greater definition of cohorts, greater diversity in terms of product offerings while still maintaining the focus on account-based pensions for retirement as the bedrock and effectively the default position.
“And with member experience, or the members interests and member experience being the drivers for all of this.”
AUTHOR
Rhea Nath
Rhea L Nath is a journalist on Super Review and InvestorDaily, with a focus on funds management, superannuation, and institutional investment. Previously, she covered small business and entrepreneurship news at Dynamic Business and multicultural issues at Indian Link Media Group. In 2022, she was named Young Journalist of the Year at the NSW Premier’s Multicultural Communications Awards.
Recommended for you
The superannuation industry will be judged by its member services rather than how effectively it accumulates wealth, according to Stephen Jones.
The profit-to-member super funds are officially operating as a merged entity, set to serve over half a million members.
Super Review announced 21 winners at the annual Super Fund of the Year Awards, including the recipient of the prestigious Fund of the Year Award.
A research firm has given UniSuper a glowing review, praising its strong leadership and “compact team”, as well as its “creditable governance” structure.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
32.57 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
32.09 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
27.42 3 y p.a(%)
