Keeping ‘best interests duty’ could protect super fund members: AIST

18 April 2023
| By Rhea Nath |
image
image
expand image

If safe harbour provisions are removed, the existing ‘best interests duty’ could ensure super fund members are not taken advantage of, according to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).

Voicing support for super funds providing advice to its members, AIST senior policy manager David Haynes pointed out that some of the proposals in the Quality of Advice Review required “fleshing out”.

“Firstly, the existing ‘best interests duty’ might provide more protections than the ‘good advice’ obligation proposed by Michelle Levy, particularly if the existing safe harbour provisions are removed,” he said.

“Secondly, the people who provide personal advice in contact centres are going to need to meet minimum standards. 

“We’re waiting on the Government to announce the consultation on the review’s recommendations, so there will be plenty of opportunity for discussion about these issues. 

“The Government has said they are not going to be having a review of a review, but it will be interesting to see if they intend to consider and progress all of the recommendations at the same time, or if they opt for a staged approach — my money is on the latter”. 

Still, the review had addressed a lot of problems facing access to advice and its affordability, Haynes acknowledged. 

Among one of the most welcomed proposals was the decision to do away with statement of advice (SOA) requirements. 

“This should help contact centres and super fund websites to be able to both answer a wider range of members’ questions and to be able to do so without getting bogged down in paperwork”, Haynes said.

He added that providing advice could be enhanced by broadening the scope to provide intra-fund advice i.e. limited advice that is ‘collectively-charged’ built into the administration fee. 

With the slew of proposed changes in the pipeline for the super system apart from the review, such as the defining the objective of super and increasing the concessional tax rate on super balances over $3 million, the AIST believed there were some significant challenges ahead. 

Hayne explained: “In terms of what this range of changes could mean for funds, there will be more engaging call centres, more dynamic use of websites, greater definition of cohorts, greater diversity in terms of product offerings while still maintaining the focus on account-based pensions for retirement as the bedrock and effectively the default position. 

“And with member experience, or the members interests and member experience being the drivers for all of this.” 
 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remain...

48 minutes 40 seconds ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

3 days 22 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

3 days 22 hours ago