From 1 January 2024, superannuation is now included as an entitlement under the National Employment Standards (NES).
The change means employees have an enforceable right to super and give them the ability to take to court under the Fair Work Act to recover unpaid super, unless this has already actioned by the Australian Taxation Office.
The entitlement aligns with super laws so if an employer complies with the super guarantee (SG) then they also meet the NES obligations.
If an employee has failed to receive their super, they can make a complaint and report their employer to the ATO. They should first check if their employment is subject to an award or registered agreement that has extra terms.
Super has to be paid at least every three months into the employee’s nominated account.
Employees who are in the national workplace relations system because their state referred their powers to make workplace laws to the Commonwealth are not entitled to super under the NES. This broadly includes employees:
Last year, the ATO said it recovered and paid $683.8 million to super funds and members after a crackdown on SG non-compliance.
During the financial year 2023, the ATO recovered over $1.1 billion in super guarantee charges (SGC), which occur when an employer does not pay super for their staff in full and on time.
The nearly $700 million distributed back to funds and individuals is a “direct boost to Australians’ retirement savings”, the ATO said, arising from unpaid super, compliance activities, and voluntary employer disclosures.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.