Lifecycle products fail to adequately address the risks that can eat away at members' retirement incomes, according to Rice Warner Actuaries.
It hit out at the concept of lifecycle products as a holistic solution to managing retirement income, as the products assumed members were the same rather than addressing an individual member's needs.
Volatility risk may be at the forefront of trustees' minds and driving the adoption of lifecycle products, Rice Warner said, because the results were reflected in returns and showed up on members' statements.
But member statements were a reflection of the past and did not look forward to the member's retirement, Rice Warner said.
Lifecycle products might deal with volatility but they did not guard against inflation risk and longevity risk, it said.
"The key to improving retirement outcomes is to manage members' funds up to and throughout retirement," said Rice Warner's chief executive Michael Rice.
Rice Warner's modeling had shown lifecycle products often provided similar returns to the fixed balanced option.
Mark Blair, Rice Warner's head of superannuation, said a typical lifecycle investment option was an asset-only solution up to the point of retirement, while a holistic solution matched a fund's asset and member needs up to and throughout retirement - it was member-centric and advice driven.
In its pre-election policy document, the FSC highlighted 15 priority reforms, with superannuation featuring prominently, urging both major parties to avoid changing super taxes without a comprehensive tax review.
The Grattan Institute has labelled the Australian super system as “too complicated” and has proposed a three-pronged reform strategy to simplify superannuation in retirement.
Super funds delivered a strong 2024 result, with the median growth fund returning 11.4 per cent, driven by strong international sharemarket performance, new data has shown.
Australian Ethical has seen FUM growth of 27 per cent in the financial year to date.