Lower fees not about 'active versus passive'

13 October 2011
| By Tim Stewart |

The focus on fees in MySuper is about delivering the benefits of scale to the end member, rather than forcing superannuation funds into indexing to reduce costs, according to Vanguard Investments head of corporate affairs and market development Robin Bowerman.

Large funds can still utilise active management and alternatives, but they have to be 'very, very sure' that they will get the outperformance to justify the fees, Bowerman said. Net returns to members is the most important factor under the Government's proposed reforms, he added.

"The fee focus is not about investment style. It's about trustees of [the large] super funds having cost as a major consideration when they make their decisions," Bowerman said.

He added there was nothing in the Cooper Review (the basis of the MySuper changes) that said funds couldn't pay high fees, as long as they were confident they would get the outperformance to justify them.

However, after 10 years of looking at active funds in the US, Vanguard research has found that low fees are a good predictor of high returns, Bowerman said.

"The lower you keep your fees (regardless of investment style - the style's irrelevant) the more you will get as a return that you can deliver back to members," he said.

As evidence, Bowerman pointed to Morningstar research that found management expense ratios (MERs) are a better predictor of fund performance than Morningstar's star rating system.

When it came to the lowering costs through scale, he said Vanguard's $1.9 trillion operation in the US was a good proxy for Australia's $1.5 trillion superannuation system.

"Over the last 30 years, [Vanguard's] average MER has been falling from 80 basis points down to about 19-20 basis points. That's a good example of how the Australian superannuation system probably hasn't managed to capture all the benefits of scale," he said.

The US experience showed that if the Australian superannuation industry captured the benefits of scale more efficiently it could get total fees (administration plus investment) down to 66 basis points - the figure cited by Deloitte in its report to the Cooper Review, Bowerman said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 6 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 7 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 7 months ago

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the longer term, AMP and asset managers warn....

6 hours ago

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time, the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley....

6 hours ago

Australia’s $4.1 trillion superannuation system is doing more than funding retirements – it’s quietly fuelling the nation’s productivity, lifting GDP, and adding thousand...

6 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5