POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Lower fees not about 'active versus passive'
The focus on fees in MySuper is about delivering the benefits of scale to the end member, rather than forcing superannuation funds into indexing to reduce costs, according to Vanguard Investments head of corporate affairs and market development Robin Bowerman.
Large funds can still utilise active management and alternatives, but they have to be 'very, very sure' that they will get the outperformance to justify the fees, Bowerman said. Net returns to members is the most important factor under the Government's proposed reforms, he added.
"The fee focus is not about investment style. It's about trustees of [the large] super funds having cost as a major consideration when they make their decisions," Bowerman said.
He added there was nothing in the Cooper Review (the basis of the MySuper changes) that said funds couldn't pay high fees, as long as they were confident they would get the outperformance to justify them.
However, after 10 years of looking at active funds in the US, Vanguard research has found that low fees are a good predictor of high returns, Bowerman said.
"The lower you keep your fees (regardless of investment style - the style's irrelevant) the more you will get as a return that you can deliver back to members," he said.
As evidence, Bowerman pointed to Morningstar research that found management expense ratios (MERs) are a better predictor of fund performance than Morningstar's star rating system.
When it came to the lowering costs through scale, he said Vanguard's $1.9 trillion operation in the US was a good proxy for Australia's $1.5 trillion superannuation system.
"Over the last 30 years, [Vanguard's] average MER has been falling from 80 basis points down to about 19-20 basis points. That's a good example of how the Australian superannuation system probably hasn't managed to capture all the benefits of scale," he said.
The US experience showed that if the Australian superannuation industry captured the benefits of scale more efficiently it could get total fees (administration plus investment) down to 66 basis points - the figure cited by Deloitte in its report to the Cooper Review, Bowerman said.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
