Self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) should come under the jurisdiction of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) instead of the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).
That is the bottom line of the latest MetLife/Super Review survey conducted during the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF) in late March.
Asked whether SMSFs should be subject to the same regulatory environment as other funds, 76.1 per cent of respondents answered yes.
On another key issue, survey respondents also overwhelmingly supported financial advisers working within superannuation funds being subject to the same compliance rules as Independent Financial Advisers (IFAs).
Asked the question about differing compliance levels, 96.3 per cent of survey respondents said superannuation fund planners needed to be treated exactly the same as IFAs.
Deloitte Access Economics has raised concerns about the government’s recent changes to the Future Fund’s investment mandate, questioning the necessity and implications of the reforms.
An industry body has praised the strong backing from institutional investors for Australia’s transition to renewable energy.
The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remains the “urgent missing piece” of the puzzle.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.