Comprehensive income products for retirement (CIPRs) should move to a modest level of compulsion by quarantining a portion of the asset base at retirement to support a defined income at older ages, Rice Warner believes.
In its CIPR development framework submission to Treasury, Rice Warner said this could be a solution as the current proposal suggest that the products are voluntary and that the potential uplift in income compared to an account based pension (ABP) is modest at best.
“Our suggestion is that, say 15 per cent of the retirement balance must be allocated to a CIPR with limited return on death,” the submission said.
“This is not appropriate for small balances so it could be limited to balances at retirement between, say, $250,000 and $1,000,000. Members would also be able to allocate more on a voluntary basis (or to opt-out if they were not interested in a CIPR).”
Rice Warner said that this would:
Rice Warner noted that while an analysis by the Australian Government Actuary showed that CIPRs could achieve an uplift in income of 15 to 30 per cent compared to an ABP with minimum pension drawdowns, it ignored the value to the member of any residual capital in the ABP, relative to the CIPR.
“…and further omits the fact that an ABP invested in a diversified portfolio could be drawn down at a rate higher than the minimum and last to (say) age 100,” the submission said.
“The analysis also does not take the Age Pension into account or the interaction of CIPR and ABP products with the means tests. This is a shortcoming as members will base their decisions on their total income.
“When we take the Age Pension and the benefits of a diversified investment portfolio (and its extra returns courtesy of the equity-risk premium) into account there is very little income uplift.”
Rice Warner also did not believe that many members would be attracted to CIPRs under the voluntary regime and that the self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) segment would not have any coverage.
“As retirees within SMSFs will likely leave the largest bequests, one of the government’s objectives will not be met,” the submission said.
Future Group is set to take on nearly $1 billion in funds under management (FUM) and welcome more than 100,000 new members following two significant successor fund transfers.
Insignia’s Master Trust business suffered a 1.9 per cent dip in FUA in the third quarter, amid total net outflows of $1.8 billion.
While the Liberal senator has accused super funds of locking everyday Australians out of the housing market, industry advocates say the Coalition’s policy would only push home ownership further out of reach.
Australia’s largest superannuation fund has confirmed all members who had funds stolen during the recent cyber fraud crime have been reimbursed.