POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
MySuper flexibility makes tailored offerings unnecessary
Treasury has told superannuation funds that the insurance and fee flexibility included in MySuper makes it unnecessary to offer separate tailored MySuper offerings for large employers.
In an address at the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia superannuation compliance summit, audience members were told that while superannuation funds were allowed to create and tailor additional MySuper products for large employers, the flexibility in the original MySuper product made it unnecessary.
Flexibility with insurance arrangements and administration fees at the workplace level may lead super funds to think they can tailor different products for large employers, but given the flexibility in the original offering, they may want to ask if that was really needed, according to principal adviser for the superannuation, financial systems division of Treasury, Jonathan Rollings.
Super funds can instead create one MySuper product and white-label it to reflect different workplaces, he said.
A large employer must have at least 500 employers, Rollings said.
"You can replace the default insurance schemes in the MySuper product with different schemes in different workplaces, and the legislation also allows for different administration fees to apply to different workplaces, to reflect any administrative efficiencies that may be accruing," he said.
Rollings also emphasised that MySuper is not a separate financial product for the purposes of the Corporations Act, and therefore there is no need for super funds to have separate accounts for members during the transition phase.
"It should be able to operate akin to a current default investment option, and can sit within a member's single account as an investment option," Rollings said.
Treasury will await any feedback about the issue, he added.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
Deloitte Access Economics has raised concerns about the government’s recent changes to the Future Fund’s investment mandate, questioning the necessity and implications of the reforms.
An industry body has praised the strong backing from institutional investors for Australia’s transition to renewable energy.
The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remains the “urgent missing piece” of the puzzle.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
