The superannuation system has not delivered the kind of returns members in default funds are entitled to expect, according to Paul Costello, chair of the Stronger Super Peak Consultative Group.
“We have created a system — and we are all part of it — which has sub-optimally managed the assets of those people,” he said.
Costello argued in order to fix this, MySuper funds should be required to be measured on more than just the monthly leagues tables published by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) — they should also be required to meet both risk and performance targets.
“The trustee offering of MySuper should be required to set out what they determine an acceptable level of risk is and set out what they expect to be the risk-adjusted 10-year rolling return,” Costello said.
He also said trustees should ask what is an acceptable level of risk-taking they would deliver against, and then uphold the expectation to manage portfolios accordingly.
Trustees should also communicate these targets with members to make the process both more accountable and transparent.
Costello said the challenge now for trustees was to come up with better, clearer, more effective and more accountable MySuper products that incorporated these ideas.
“I would argue that that represents both an extraordinary challenge and opportunity for the industry,” he said.
Costello said that consultation on the proposed regulations ended on 30 May, and trustees could expect to see legislation in the second half of the year.
Deloitte Access Economics has raised concerns about the government’s recent changes to the Future Fund’s investment mandate, questioning the necessity and implications of the reforms.
An industry body has praised the strong backing from institutional investors for Australia’s transition to renewable energy.
The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remains the “urgent missing piece” of the puzzle.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.