POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Nationalising super a moral hazard: ASFA
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has hit back at Liberal senator Andrew Bragg’s call to nationalise superannuation and put all Australians into a national default fund managed by the Future Fund unless they opt out.
ASFA said nationalising superannuation was facile and at odds with concerns regarding concentration and common ownership of Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) companies.
ASFA chief executive, Dr Martin Fahy, said: “This illiberal idea is inconsistent with the recently-announced House of Representatives inquiry into concentration and common ownership in the Australian share market and would exacerbate the very issues which are the apparent cause of concern for this inquiry.
"Moreover, the industry is still in the process of implementing the latest round of major reforms which were legislated only last month, so creating further confusion for Australians right now is perplexing, particularly given the strong performance of superannuation funds over the past year."
ASFA said the head of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) was also against nationalising super.
"Putting the precious retirement savings of Australian workers into a nationalised entity raises the spectre that down the road we could of see the fund raided for pet projects and political interference in its investment decisions,” Fahy said.
"Defaulting people into a government-controlled superannuation fund will lead to the moral hazard of superannuants expecting the Government to underwrite their retirement outcomes and pick up the bill for any underperformance or losses in the long-term.”
Bragg, along with the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS), launched a discussion paper today calling for a Government-run default super fund.
“The Future Fund provides high returns and lower costs for consumers, benefiting not only members of the fund but all Australians by creating a competitive benchmark for the entire sector,” Bragg said.
Bragg said the “closed oligopoly of funds had led to a sluggish, inefficient, and greedy industry”.
“The super funds have had it far too easy for far too long. It’s essentially been a gravy train. With these reforms competitors would have to do better to attract customers to opt out of the default and opt into their fund,” Bragg said
Recommended for you
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
why would anyone want to put their super under gov control?? this is a crazy idea, from a senator.