POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Nationalising super a moral hazard: ASFA
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has hit back at Liberal senator Andrew Bragg’s call to nationalise superannuation and put all Australians into a national default fund managed by the Future Fund unless they opt out.
ASFA said nationalising superannuation was facile and at odds with concerns regarding concentration and common ownership of Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) companies.
ASFA chief executive, Dr Martin Fahy, said: “This illiberal idea is inconsistent with the recently-announced House of Representatives inquiry into concentration and common ownership in the Australian share market and would exacerbate the very issues which are the apparent cause of concern for this inquiry.
"Moreover, the industry is still in the process of implementing the latest round of major reforms which were legislated only last month, so creating further confusion for Australians right now is perplexing, particularly given the strong performance of superannuation funds over the past year."
ASFA said the head of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) was also against nationalising super.
"Putting the precious retirement savings of Australian workers into a nationalised entity raises the spectre that down the road we could of see the fund raided for pet projects and political interference in its investment decisions,” Fahy said.
"Defaulting people into a government-controlled superannuation fund will lead to the moral hazard of superannuants expecting the Government to underwrite their retirement outcomes and pick up the bill for any underperformance or losses in the long-term.”
Bragg, along with the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS), launched a discussion paper today calling for a Government-run default super fund.
“The Future Fund provides high returns and lower costs for consumers, benefiting not only members of the fund but all Australians by creating a competitive benchmark for the entire sector,” Bragg said.
Bragg said the “closed oligopoly of funds had led to a sluggish, inefficient, and greedy industry”.
“The super funds have had it far too easy for far too long. It’s essentially been a gravy train. With these reforms competitors would have to do better to attract customers to opt out of the default and opt into their fund,” Bragg said
Recommended for you
Future Group is set to take on nearly $1 billion in funds under management (FUM) and welcome more than 100,000 new members following two significant successor fund transfers.
Insignia’s Master Trust business suffered a 1.9 per cent dip in FUA in the third quarter, amid total net outflows of $1.8 billion.
While the Liberal senator has accused super funds of locking everyday Australians out of the housing market, industry advocates say the Coalition’s policy would only push home ownership further out of reach.
Australia’s largest superannuation fund has confirmed all members who had funds stolen during the recent cyber fraud crime have been reimbursed.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
90.28 3 y p.a(%)
2
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
37.08 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.44 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.12 3 y p.a(%)
5
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
28.28 3 y p.a(%)
why would anyone want to put their super under gov control?? this is a crazy idea, from a senator.