No exit fees could end up costing members more

10 May 2018
| By Hannah |
image
image
expand image

The removal of superannuation fund exit fees, as announced in this week’s Federal Budget, may just result on all members paying more as “cross-subsidisation issues” arise, NGS Super acting chief executive, Laura Wright, has warned.

Wright said removing fees would not change that fact administrators charged for the provision of that service.

“It’s an activity and that has a cost,” she said.

Someone would need to be paying those amounts, and Wright warned that the money could come from higher fees for all members.

She said that this would result in long-term members unfairly “cross-subsidising” the exit costs of those who changed funds every few years.

While Wright understood the Government’s possible incentives, such as consolidating accounts and minimising fees for low balance accounts, she did not believe that exit fees posed a barrier to consolidation in practice.

The chief executive also said that in her long career working with super funds, she had heard very few complaints regarding exit fees.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by David on Tue, 10/30/2018 - 09:29

Hi. Due to growing medical costs I am considering making a financial hardship withdrawal from my current fund for the maximum 10k. I have a legacy account with the fund, and I am 5 years from retirement age and the age that was set in the policy. Although I am allowed to make this withdrawal, I have been told that there will be a +$600 exit fee. I have since discovered a new legislation that states all super funds to be banned from charging exit fees. Will this affect me? Is this law now applicable and if not when will it be? Thank you, David.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

The government’s adjustment to the Future Fund’s mandate could set a dangerous precedent, warns an economist, raising concerns that it may pave the way for problematic fu...

39 minutes 41 seconds hence

The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remain...

1 hour ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

3 days 23 hours ago