POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
No sense moving retirees to conservative investments
The commonly held view that investors should shift their portfolio to a more conservative asset allocation once they move into the drawdown phase will actually increase their longevity risk and reduce the amount of time their savings last into retirement, according to financial services consultants Path Independent.
By analysing historical equity market data from the year 1900, the firm found that in a large majority of cases a high allocation to equities in a portfolio would have helped increase the portfolio longevity of retirees.
True longevity risk in a portfolio comes not from volatility during the drawdown phase but from the likelihood funds will be depleted during the lifetime of the investor, which happens with far greater frequency in a conservative portfolio than a growth portfolio, according to Path Independent managing director Geoff Watkins.
The greatest negative long-term impact on growth portfolios resulted not from short severe downturns such as the Great Depression but from extended periods of high inflation such as that seen in the 1970s, according to the report.
But even in the few timeframes where conservative portfolios outperformed growth over a long period, this improvement was minor — a total longevity improvement of only one or two years, Watkins said.
By contrast, the median growth portfolio over the entire dataset lasted 40 years, compared to 35 years for the median balanced portfolio and 25 years for a median conservative portfolio. There was little difference between the three portfolio styles over the past 24 years, however.
The findings suggest a big rethink to post-retirement asset allocation may be required, with no evidence to support a shift to a more conservative structure, Watkins said.
Even in the event of a GFC-type downturn there is only a small proportion of the portfolio that would be drawn down before the markets recovered, leaving the bulk of the portfolio positioned for future growth, he said.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
