The Institute for Public Accountants has slammed penalties for super guarantee (SG) non-compliance as “draconian,” saying that they could be very damaging to struggling small businesses and warning that more red tape could be coming.
Presently, non-complying employers would be required to pay “onerous charges” of both the total of their total SG shortfalls for the year and nominal interest and administration fees for that quarter.
They could also be liable to pay an additional SG penalty of up to 200 per cent of the SG charge payable should they fail to lodge an SG statement to the Commissioner.
The IPA labelled such punishments “draconian,” saying that it could damage small businesses struggling with cash flow issues.
While IPA chief executive officer, Andrew Conway, acknowledged that employers should make timely and accurate superannuation payments on behalf of their staff, he slammed the penalties for failing to differentiate between small businesses.
“Let’s get human and … not tar every small business with the same excessive compliance brush,” he said.
Conway said “a more measured approach” to non-compliance was needed, with the “draconian” measures needing to go before new measures, such as education, imprisonment or directions to pay, were added.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.