Australia’s big four banks have had their ratings upgraded from ‘negative’ to ‘stable’ by S&P Global Ratings in light of the country’s economic recovery.
This was a reflection of Australia being given a AAA rating which, S&P said, was because of the country’s “strong economic recovery”. It added that it had been “quicker and stronger than we previously expected”.
S&P said: “The Government's policy response and strong economic rebound have reduced downside risks to our economic and fiscal outlook for Australia. As a result, we are revising the outlook to stable and affirming our 'AAA/A-1+' long- and short-term local and foreign currency ratings".
It added it did not expect shorter lockdowns in Melbourne, which was currently in an ongoing lockdown, or other areas to “derail” this economic recovery.
Westpac and NAB both announced to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) that their current issuer credit rating was AA- long term and A-1+ in the short term, with the outlook revised to ‘stable’.
Commenting, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, said: “Australia remains one of just nine countries to hold a AAA credit rating from the three major rating agencies.
“Last week’s National Accounts saw the economy increase 1.8% in the March quarter with output now 0.8% above its pre-pandemic level. This is a feat no major advanced economy has achieved and is in contrast to Japan, France, Germany and the UK who all contracted in the March quarter 2021 while the euro area is back in recession.”
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.