POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
PC chastened over fund performance methodology
The Productivity Commission (PC) has again been taken to task over its approach to superannuation investment performance – this time by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
In a submission responding to the PC’s Supplementary Paper on Investment Performance, the ASFA has expressed concern about the commission’s approach, particularly around the benchmarking of individual fund/product performance.
Barely a week after actuarial research house, Rice Warner questioned the PC’s approach, the ASFA submission said it considered that “numerous caveats/limitations stem from the Commission’s data and benchmarking methodology”.
“Together, these caveats/limitations suggest there is a significant margin of error around any threshold for ‘underperforming’ funds or products,” it said. “Nonetheless, the Commission defines underperformance as a very small deviation from what is an approximate threshold.”
“In addition, in terms of forward-looking performance assessment, the Commission’s current analysis shows that measures of short-term investment returns are not a reliable predictor of long-term performance,” the submission said.
“ASFA considers there would be risks around applying the Commission’s current approach to any selection process for funds or products,” it said. “ASFA is concerned about underperformance and the impact on consumers.”
However, the submission said that given these issues, ASFA considered it would be difficult to draw definite conclusions as to whether particular funds/products were “underperformers”.
“In this regard, there is a risk that funds/products would be designated as ‘underperforming’ despite having the potential to deliver high returns over the long term,” the ASFA submission said.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
