Pillar sale brings admin competition into focus

22 March 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Competition needs to be maintained in the superannuation administration sector, according to a Super Review roundtable of senior superannuation executives conducted during the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF).

Just months ahead of the NSW Government initiating the sales process for Pillar Administration, most roundtable participants agreed that it would be concerning if the owner of the largest superannuation administrator, Australian Administration Services (AAS), was allowed to acquire Pillar.

AAS is owned by Link Market Services which recently acquired Superpartners, making it the largest administration entity.

All the roundtable participants agreed that it was desirable and healthy to maintain competition in the administration space, with both EISS Super chief executive, Alex Hutchison and Kinetic Super chief investment officer, Paul Kessell pointing to their use of AAS but urging the maintenance of continued competition.

Kessell said that at the moment Link was the dominant player in the market and that, given the barriers to entry, there seemed little interest from overseas players.

Pillar Administration chief executive, Peter Brook said he recognised that Link had been touted as an acquirer for the Pillar business — something which would give Link "close to 90 per cent of the total market".

He said that while third party administrators such as Pillar and AAS were not regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), Pillar had held meetings with the regulator where it had been acknowledged that it was an area of interest.

Brook pointed to the fact that academic research had pointed to systems risk with respect to custodians.

"There are a lot more custodians than third party administrators and Link has its own systems and I can understand why APRA might therefore be concerned," he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Not so on Tue, 03/22/2016 - 21:46

The suggestion that Link would have 90% of the fund admin market is just plain wrong. The majority of funds with contestible fund admin operate self administration.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 4 months ago

Future Group is set to take on nearly $1 billion in funds under management (FUM) and welcome more than 100,000 new members following two significant successor fund transf...

4 hours ago

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has issued a sobering assessment of the global economic landscape in its latest World Economic Outlook, dramatically revised after D...

6 hours 58 minutes ago

Growth from the listed company’s key businesses has propelled Generational Development Group to new milestones in the three months to 31 March....

7 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND