Superannuation disputes have become a major target area for plaintiff law firms, according to a recent Super Review roundtable.
Chief operating officer of industry fund REST, Paul Sayer, said the first thing a member should be doing is talking to their fund, rather than lawyers.
The roundtable revealed major group insurance had held discussions about the increasing early involvement of lawyers during disputes and the manner in which this could erode the ultimate benefit flowing to members.
The increasing involvement of lawyers, according to roundtable participants, undermines the ability for superannuation disputes to be solved via the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal.
Australian Administration Services chief information officer, Tim Buskens, said that whereas lawyers had historically become involved in superannuation disputes in the mid-to-latter stages of the process, they were now emerging from the outset.
"Now we're finding just through our general mail room operations, at the very first stage, the very first letter is generally from a legal firm, and I think that's a shift," he said.
AIA head of group insurance Eleanor Ottaviano said there had been agreement across the industry that there was a need to educate members about the disputes process with respect to insurance.
"We absolutely need to get there and better help members in that process because if at the end of the day the solicitor is really just filling in that form on behalf of the member, and that was going to get paid anyway, what value are they adding to the process and how much are they taking of the member's benefit," she said.
Energy Industry Super chief executive Alex Hutchison agreed that whereas lawyers might once have become involved at the end of the superannuation complaints process, they were increasingly being seen at the beginning.
"Now you see them at the beginning of the process. Are they touting for work? Yes they're touting for work in this area, no different to running ads on financial advice and being subject to poor financial advice in any other type of financial services area," he said.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.