Political advertising does not breach sole purpose says AustSuper

4 September 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

AustralianSuper has told the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services that it believes political advertising is allowable and consistent with the so-called “sole purpose test” within the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act (SIS Act).

In written submissions responding to the Royal Commission’s most recent round of hearings and dealing with its financial support for Industry Super Australia’s (ISA’s) ‘fox in the henhouse’ advertising campaign, AustralianSuper has cited the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in claiming that “public advocacy conducted through ‘political advertising’ is entirely consistent with the sole purpose in section 62 of the SIS Act, provided the advocacy is aptly directed to the maintenance and improvement of retirement benefits”.

The big industry fund also referred to the constitutional right of organisations to participate in policy debates.

“There is no reason to construe section 62 of the SIS Act as prohibiting absolutely policy (or political) communications undertaken by superannuation trustees, and any such absolute prohibition would be likely to infringe the constitutional freedom referred to in the preceding paragraph,” the fund’s submission said.

“It is consistent with the sole purpose of providing retirement benefits for a trustee to engage in policy (or political) communications which are properly directed to maintaining and improving the retirement benefits received by the trustee’s beneficiaries.”

“As the High Court concluded in a broadly analogous context, public advocacy which is suitably directed to influencing government policy on the best methods for the relief of poverty through the provision of foreign aid is not disqualified from being characterised as charitable merely because the activity takes the form of political communications,” it submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 4 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 4 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 5 hours ago