Superannuation funds have another reason to assess data collection and storage processes as new privacy legislation is introduced from March next year.
According to chief executive of the Association for Data-driven Marketing and Advertising (ADMA) Jodie Sangster, incoming amendments have dredged up big issues around trans-border data flows as more and more companies turn to hosting data in cloud solutions.
Some of the changes did not seem substantial, but if a super fund got it wrong each infringement could cost $1.7 million, Sangster said. It was therefore important funds extended privacy policies and practices to comply with new legislation.
“They need to have processes, procedures, and practices in place to make sure they are protecting the data,” she said.
“That’s going to be quite an undertaking for a company as large as a super fund - to actually go through and make sure that data is secure.”
The changes include new powers for the privacy commissioner to audit companies, and also an increased obligation on behalf of companies to proactively inform customers about data collection processes and embed that message into communications materials.
Sangster said all companies needed to conduct an audit of their data and review new definitions for what is considered private information.
Super funds that had not yet updated legacy systems might need to work more quickly.
“Every business has data all over the place, it’s in spreadsheets, it’s in databases,” Sangster said.
“Step one is what have you got, where is it, let’s have a look at it and make sure it’s all in one spot.”
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.