Scale is not a big issue in the minds of Australian superannuation fund trustees, with most worried more about regulatory change and market volatility, according to new research released this week.
The research, conducted and released by the Sydney office of US-based Parametric Trustees, identified the issues of most concern to trustees as being regulatory change, inadequate post-retirement solutions for members and the negative impact of a sharp market fall on member balances.
Also worrying trustees were issues such their fund's operations and business, such as keeping technology current and finding and retaining talent, as well as hidden costs that erode returns including tax, foreign exchange, brokerage, and low interest on cash.
The survey sampled the views of trustees from APRA-regulated funds, with Parametric acknowledging most responses had come from funds with funds under management of between $5 billion and $10 billion, and mostly industry funds.
It noted that scale did not seem to be an issue in the minds of respondents, with most respondents ranking at the bottom end of their response.
Commenting on the results, Parametric Australasia chief executive, Chris Briant said he believed the key themes for super trustees this year would be dealing with an (ever) changing superannuation tax and regulatory landscape, developing ‘CIPR' post-retirement solutions for members, and employing investment approaches designed to immunise members against market volatility and falls.
"Operational strategy, tax management, and implementation efficiency are also likely to feature in funds' 2016 strategic agendas," he said.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.