REI Super has been building up its cash holdings and selling off equities, according to its investment consultant.
Ibbotson Associates managing director and chief investment officer, Daniel Needham, said the fund had continued to sell its exposure to equities and assets that had done well in December.
"We've stopped selling bonds because bonds are no longer moving up in price, they're moving down, but what we're doing is building extra cash," he said.
Needham said that although some thought it was a time for investors to be aggressive, the consultant was taking a cautious approach.
As other asset classes started to look less attractive, the fund was holding "higher than normal amounts of cash", Needham said, and if the market environment continued, it would continue to sell better-returning assets and build up cash.
"Our goal is always to buy assets at attractive prices, and that tends to be at times when most people are very concerned about markets - and that certainly isn't the case now," he said.
Prices would fluctuate a lot, so patient long-term investors would be able to buy assets at more attractive prices in the future, according to Needham.
He said REI had also invested into Australian commercial property and unhedged assets for their defensive characteristics.
Within equities, REI had invested into global listed infrastructure, because cash flows were less sensitive to the economic cycle and they were well priced.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.