Superannuation statements should replace annual balances with an estimate of annual retirment income as the headline figure provided to members to remind them of the purpose of their fund and its long term goal according to an industry consultant and academic.
Macquarie Applied Finance Centre honorary fellow Peter Vann said fund performance and annual balances are a backward looking, point in time result that are ineffective in providing an actual picture of a member's retirement income.
According to Vann member balances are a distraction from the purpose of superannuation — to provide a retirement income stream — and may be obscuring action that would lead to a higher final retirement income in the fund.
"Superannuation balances appear to most fund members as money they can't access and are focused on returns but not on where the member may be heading in retirement," Vann said.
"If super funds produced member reports with an estimate of annual retirement income based on that balance most members would understand that idea better than the current annual reports. They already receive a regular pay-check from their employer and super statements could reflect that approach of ‘how much will I have in the hand each week?'."
Vann said the shift would not require high levels of financial literacy or education but "would have powerful consequences that created greater engagement by fund members before retirement in address retirement income adequacy".
He said fund members would be faced with saving more, retiring later or changing their investment strategy which opened up the potential for financial planning advice.
"It sounds like a paradigm shift but this is not a new idea and is something that should have been done 20 years ago when the move began from defined benefit to defined contribution funds," Vann said.
"An estimates approach allows members and their advisers to model returns and volatility in different asset classes during real market conditions and aims for long term outcomes based in the future and not short term fixed past returns."
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.