The amount retirees draw down their super is rational and does not point to unnecessary frugality, according to Rice Warner.
In an analysis, the research house said the Retirement Income Review’s suggestion that retirees did not draw down enough of their super was only based on small studies which coincided with high investment returns.
Pointing to data of those who were aged 65 to 70 in 2000, Rice Warner said there was a trend in Age Pension dependency of the surviving pensioners.
“The trend shows that people do spend quite a bit of their accumulated superannuation early in retirement – more self-funded retirees shift to part pensions over time, and more part pensioners shift to become full pensioners,” it said.
“Overall, the behaviour appears rational and does not point to unnecessary frugality.”
People aged 65 to 70 in 2000
Source: Rice Warner
Rice Warner said while the overall dependency on the Age Pension increased with age, there were steps that could be taken to improve expenditure patterns in retirement.
It said some steps included:
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.