The Government has released its retirement income covenant position paper for consultation.
It said the covenant would codify the requirements and obligations for superannuation trustees to improve retirement outcomes for individuals, while enabling choice and competition in the retirement phase.
The paper outlined the fundamental obligations of trustees to formulate, review regularly, and give effect to a retirement income strategy.
The strategy, it said, would be a strategic document developed by the trustee to outline their plan to assist their members to achieve and balance objectives which were:
“Requiring trustees to have a retirement income strategy ensures that they identify and recognise the retirement income needs of the members of their fund and have a plan to build the fund’s capacity and capability to service those needs,” the paper said.
“The strategy should reflect a trustee’s broad understanding of their membership, either for the members of the fund as a whole or for cohorts of members. The characteristics of these cohorts are at the discretion of trustees but could be determined by factors such as superannuation balance, home ownership status, partnered status, or age of retirement.”
The paper outlined a summary of obligations and discretions of trustees that included:
The Government said it would consult further on exposure draft legislation later this year. Subject to the passage of legislation, this covenant would commence from 1 July, 2022.
The consultation of the paper would close on 6 August, 2021.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.