RIC needs to address advice issues

19 October 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

As the Retirement Income Covenant (RIC) has implications for financial advice, guidance is needed about the boundaries between the provision of factual information and general advice, according to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).

AIST’s submission to the RIC exposure draft legislation said while it supported a principles-based RIC, it recommended consequential legislative and regulatory changes.

The changes included:

  • The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) should update their guidance about the boundaries between the provision of factual information and general advice in relation to the RIC, and the explanatory memorandum (EM) foreshadow this;
  • The legislation should explicitly provide protection from liability for a fund where a higher drawdown rate was a part of properly constructed and compliant retirement income strategy;
  • The EM should foreshadow the extension of intra-fund advice to allow the provision of advice on how a member might best provide for their retirement, including consideration of household’s retirement adequacy, Age Pension eligibility, non-superannuation assets, and income. The Government should announce legislation to support such an extension; and
  • The explanatory material should reiterate that a super fund is able to offer members general advice about retirement product options without breaching anti-hawking legislation, and that the Government expects that ASIC would be issuing guidance and parameters within which this could occur.

On how retirees chose to access their retirement balances, AIST said the EM needed to confirm that retirees, and especially those with modest levels of retirement savings, were not precluded from accessing these as a lump sum.

AIST also noted the legislation needed to state that trustees would have regard to the needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in their retirement income strategies and development of cohorts.

The requirement for trustees to make every determination made about their strategy public was unnecessarily onerous and should be removed, AIST believed.

It was also recommended that:

  • Safe harbour protections should be provided to super funds;
  • A data-sharing framework be created for government agencies to assist trustees to meet their obligations;
  • A flexible implementation period, where the requirement for a retirement income strategy would be voluntary for the first 12 months from 1 July, 2022, then mandatory on 1 July, 2023; and
  • The EM should foreshadow the Government’s intention to have defined and consistent retirement income product labels and standardised disclosures.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

10 months 2 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

10 months 3 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

10 months 3 weeks ago

The superannuation industry will be judged by its member services rather than how effectively it accumulates wealth, according to Stephen Jones....

17 hours ago

APRA’s latest data has revealed that superannuation funds spent $1.3 billion on advice fees, with the vast majority sent to external financial advisers....

17 hours ago

The profit-to-member super funds are officially operating as a merged entity, set to serve over half a million members. ...

3 days 16 hours ago