POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Rice Warner points to exorbitant fees
Superannuation fund members who choose ethical investments need to be careful they are not putting their emotions ahead of value, according to actuarial research house, Rice Warner.
In an analysis of ethical investment options in superannuation, Rice Warner pointed out that statistical evidence suggests that the rates of return between ethical investment options and non-ethical investment options do not vary materially.
However, it suggests that the small amount of assets in ethical options usually means they are more expensive as they lack scale benefits.
"We don't expect any material difference in returns from the style of investing though there will be differences in levels of investment competence," the analysis said.
"Nonetheless, people don't appear to pick these options to get better returns. In most cases, it appears that the decision for ethical investment is primarily emotive."
It said this primarily emotive approach had created a risk that superannuants would trade off their emotions against value in products.
"Unfortunately, this risk has been realised, with some products on the market which appeal directly to a member's sense of social obligation, charging exorbitant fees," Rice Warner said.
In doing so, it published a table (below) in which it compared the fees of mainstream funds such as Australian Super and UniSuper and compared them to the fees of relatively recently-established ethical funds some of which were nearly double those of the mainstream.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
