POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Risk models must be reassessed
Super funds and investors must change the way they measure investment risk, according to investment experts at the Fund Executive Association (FEAL) Conference, where traditional risk models were branded as flawed.
Managing director of risk analysis company CheckRisk, Nick Bullman, told the conference that traditional investment models measured risk as a flat line on a graph, when in reality risk behaved differently - clustering together in times of high volatility and feeding on itself.
Investors should measure risk in ways that don't rely on the standard valuations of risk, which are flawed in many cases, he said.
Super funds and investors also need to start sequencing risk to understand how it changes over time, Bullman said.
"It's incredibly difficult to predict, but it's something you can measure in terms of rate of change, and in terms of like a seismologist might - when tremors are starting, seeing pressure build in the system - which can give you [an edge] in terms of protecting your portfolio," he said.
"Maybe we just need a fresh approach, we've all been lulled into a false sense of security in terms of having positive real returns and positive relative returns - we now need to become risk managers on a daily basis," Bullman said.
Russell Investments' Dianna Zentner - director, global manager oversight and due diligence - warned that one small risk that seemed manageable could spark a multitude of risks that could quickly become uncontrollable.
"We see all the time the same kinds of risk that boil underneath the surface; little things that seem innocuous, but then all of sudden, there's another risk, and then another risk and pretty soon it just explodes. Reputational risk, regulatory risk, all kinds of things happen at that stage," she said.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
