Scenario analysis and reverse stress-testing key building a risk model

6 March 2012
| By Andrew Tsanadis |
image
image
expand image

Scenario analysis and reverse stress testing are two techniques that risk managers should focus on when developing a risk model for an investment portfolio, according to an industry expert.

Speaking at the SunGard APT 'Meeting The 2012 Risk Challenges' briefing, SunGard head of research Dr Laurence Wormald believes one of the biggest challenges for risk managers is being able to demonstrate the value of risk management. 

Adding value to the investment process is having the ability to tell a good story about risk, and the three pillars for determining risk are risk measurement, risk attribution and scenario analysis, he said.

"Thinking about what might happen if the market is shocked is the best way to think about risk management," Wormald said.

"You need a way of looking at the non-linear pay-off associated with the derivatives that make up an investment portfolio. That's a real challenge for the linear factor model providers."

Wormald believes an important technique in risk modelling is scenario analysis, which involves using both historical scenarios that have been observed over the past 30 years and forward looking scenarios - both of which focus on shocks to the market.

It's a framework that focuses on shocks to levels, volatility and correlation, and works across any asset class, he said. 

"Forward looking models should be based on observable factors.

"Some things don't make sense economically, they don't make sense from a macro point of view - we're wasting our time trying to build scenarios that don't obey the basic laws of the global economy," he added.

Another vital tool in the scenario analysis approach is what Wormald describes as "reverse stress-testing" which helps risk managers understand what part of a portfolio is experiencing loss.

"It (reverse stress-testing) turns the conventional question around - instead of saying, 'how much will I be hurt under a particular scenario?', it asks 'what could hurt me the most?'," he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

19 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

20 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

21 hours ago