SCT flays super fund over insurance

6 April 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

A superannuation fund which failed to inform a member that his default insurance cover had been cancelled because of insufficient funds to meet the premium has been required to pay his daughter $176,000.

In a determination (D16-17\123) handed down in January, this year, the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) pointed to multiple shortcomings on the part of the superannuation fund ahead of the member’s ultimate death.

The SCT determination said that from the information provided, the tribunal was satisfied that the trustee failed to:

  • Provide the deceased member with a product disclosure statement (PDS) at or before the time he joined the fund or within three months of joining the fund;
  • Inform the deceased member he was a member of the fund and had been provided with basic cover;
  • Provide the deceased member with information about the cost of insurance and the option to elect what component of insurance he wanted;
  • Advise the deceased member that there were insufficient monies in the account balance to pay for basic cover premiums;
  • Inform the deceased member that basic cover was cancelled at any time;
  • Inform the deceased member what choices he had in relation to maintaining insurance cover once basic cover had been cancelled; and
  • Make any attempts or reasonable attempts to obtain the address of the deceased member, so the PDS, relevant information and notices could be sent to him.

The tribunal said that having carefully considered the material it had determined the deceased member, “at the very least, had a reasonable expectation that the cancellation of basic cover would have been communicated to him by the trustee within a reasonable period of time of its occurrence and by failing to so do, the trustee has engaged in circumstantial silence”.

Referring to a letter sent to the member about the commencement of his cover, the SCT determination said: “In this regard, the dissemination of the letter dated 6 September 2012 by the trustee, knowing as it did, that the totality of the deceased member’s insurance status and future insurance status was in fact overstated, only goes to further establish this fact,” the determination said. “The obligation of the trustee not to engage in misleading or deceptive conduct, in its formal interactions with the deceased member, goes to the very heart of the fiduciary obligations it owed to him.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 18 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 18 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 19 hours ago