POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
SCT inefficient, says lawyer
A financial services lawyer has defended the increasing early involvement of plaintiff law firms in superannuation disputes, claiming the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) often took longer than many court proceedings.
Maurice Blackburn superannuation specialist Michael Bates responded to comments from a recent Super Review roundtable about potential detrimental effects that early involvement of lawyers could have on super fund members during disputes.
Australian Administration Services chief information officer Tim Buskens said lawyers would usually get involved in the mid-to-latter stages of the process, but they were now emerging from the outset.
The panel agreed this undermined the ability of the SCT to resolve the matters.
However, Bates said early or earlier engagement of lawyers in superannuation disputes sped up the process, criticising the SCT for the length of time it takes to resolve a case.
"The SCT has, certainly in more recent times, become a tribunal that's very slow to deal with matters," Bates said.
"Even in cases where we've taken to the SCT, the delay has been so significant that we now have to advise our clients that taking the matter to court is in fact going to result in a quicker resolution."
From his experience, Bates said the Tribunal would usually take 12-18 months — sometimes even up to two years — to deal with a matter.
"If you put that into context, that is a period of time after the claim has been lodged, considered and presumably rejected, which in itself is another 12 months," Bates said.
"So you have somebody who has an insurance entitlement under superannuation that they've worked hard for all their life, they then suffered an injury or illness, they've stopped working, they've got bills to pay and a family to look after," he said.
After the claim is lodged, it usually takes the superannuation fund or their insurance company six to 12 months to get a decision. If that decision is to reject the claim, they can either ask for the decision to be reviewed or they can go to the SCT.
"That means you're putting another two years on top of that, which is a significant period of time for somebody who has a disability to be waiting to receive what really should be theirs."
Bates added superannuation disputes are often complex and require a legal expert.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
