Superannuation funds need to develop default pension portfolios designed to deal with short-to-medium term volatility without upsetting their sustainability and prospects for long-term growth, according to a Rice Warner.
It said risk-averse people entering retirement and paranoid about investment losses placed about $5 billion into bank term deposits even though these only paid about 2.5 per cent and interest rates were predicted to stay low for the foreseeable future.
It said a default pension portfolio should meet two primary needs of retired members:
"They impose competing investment objectives that cannot be met through a traditional investment strategy," the analysis said.
"Short-term income needs demand income from liquid assets that cannot provide sufficient growth to meet a portfolio's long-term objectives.
"Long-term protection against inflation and longevity demands investment in growth assets that have inherently volatile market prices; and asset values could be depressed when cash is needed."
Rice Warner said the optimal solution required a separation of needs and a separation of assets to meet those needs.
Rice Warner proposed a multi-bucketed approach solution as:
Rice Warner also suggested that super funds should use a bucketed approach but park 15 or 20 per cent of the member's benefit into a pooled arrangement for the later years of life as it would be difficult to predict how quickly a retiree should draw down on their capital.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.