Shareholder resolution framework is flawed

26 October 2017
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Australian laws make it difficult for shareholders to hold public companies to account on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, according to the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI).

ACSI said the current corporate governance framework restricted the ability for shareholders to bring resolutions at company meetings. It said under the existing framework, shareholders who wished to raise an issue must propose a constitutional amendment or vote against the re-election of directors.

ACSI chief executive, Louise Davidson, said: “In other jurisdictions where non-binding shareholder resolutions are permitted, we have seen shareholders use them to improve company disclosure on risks associated with sustainability, climate change, and labour and human rights”.

“There is a clear consensus among investors that the current framework is too restrictive and needs to be reformed. We need to develop a better way for shareholder concerns to be heard,” Davidson said.

ACSI’s ‘Shareholder Resolutions in Australia: Is there a better way?’ report recommended an introduction of a non-binding shareholder resolution in Australia, while maintaining the current threshold of five per cent of capital or 100 shareholders for bringing proposals.

It said this could provide a mechanism for escalating ESG issues where company engagement was not working.

“We have seen a rush of shareholder resolutions this AGM [Annual General Meeting] season which are actually seeking to create a non-binding vote in individual companies. We think this issue would be better dealt with on a market-wide basis,” Davidson said.

“We want to see all companies better managing climate-related, labour and human rights or disclosure risks and our proposal for reform will help deliver this.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 3 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 3 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 3 months ago

In what is being called a coordinated cyber attack, a number of Australia’s largest superannuation funds have suffered a breach with thousands of user accounts compromise...

19 hours ago

Donald Trump’s tariff blitz has shaken global markets, fuelling uncertainty over trade retaliation, recession, and economic fallout, while Australia, though bruised, esca...

20 hours ago

Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor has vowed to slash red tape and introduce a suite of financial services reforms aimed at transforming Australia into a leading financial hub...

1 day 19 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS