A significant number of superannuation fund trustees and executives believe there need to be changes to the sole purpose test to give them more flexibility to operate in current commercial circumstances.
A survey conducted at the recent Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) national conference revealed the degree to which fund executives and trustees regarded the terms of the sole purpose test contained within the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act as an impediment.
The survey, sponsored by EISS Super, noted that the sole purpose test restricted the services that could be offered by superannuation funds, and then canvassed whether it should be modified, made more flexible or abandoned.
Significantly, more than half of respondents to the survey said they believed it should be either made more flexible or abandoned altogether, with most opting for a more flexible approach.
The survey revealed that 48.7 per cent of respondents believed the sole purpose test should be made more flexible, while a further 5.1 per cent believed it should be abandoned altogether.
However, 35.80 per cent of respondents said they believed it should left alone and retained in its present form.
Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time, the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley.
Australia’s $4.1 trillion superannuation system is doing more than funding retirements – it’s quietly fuelling the nation’s productivity, lifting GDP, and adding thousands to workers’ pay packets, according to new analysis from the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
Large superannuation accounts may need to find funds outside their accounts or take the extreme step of selling non-liquid assets under the proposed $3 million super tax legislation, according to new analysis from ANU.
Economists have been left scrambling to recalibrate after the Reserve Bank wrong-footed markets on Tuesday, holding the cash rate steady despite widespread expectations of a cut.
The reason EISS wants it changed so industry funds can keep using member funds to continue the exorbitantly expensive adverting campaigns and directors fees and benefits.