Smaller funds not forced to merge: legalsuper

25 March 2014
| By Malavika Santhebennur |
image
image
expand image

legalsuper chief executive Andrew Proebstl has rejected views that small super funds under $5 billion would be forced to merge or be wrapped into large funds in the near future as they struggle to stay competitive.

His comments come as media reports suggested about a quarter of the sector, worth $143 billion, is for the taking, with funds worth less than $5 billion being forced to improve their offerings or face the threat of merging with bigger players.

But Proebstl believes most funds with less than $5 billion are specialist industry funds that can provide a personalised service and keep costs low when compared to large funds.

"Like with any issue, nothing is ever one-dimensional," he said.

"The question of whether funds merge or not needs a much more sophisticated consideration than just whether you're above or below $5 billion or any other magical numbers you might pick.

"It just needs to look at the whole picture and by doing that, form a complete view of whether a merger is in the best interests of the members or not."

Proebstl said both large and small funds were finding it difficult to grow membership as increasing awareness among members was reducing the level of growth in multiple accounts.

"If people have an existing account they'll take that account with them when they change jobs. There's growing awareness and funds are becoming more competitive in terms of trying to attract new members," he said.

Larger funds have a membership with a non-uniform risk profile and may only access generic and uncompetitive products at a greater cost, he said.

Proebstl posited that funds need to look at whether there is a similarity in offering and "equivalence in benefits" before merging. They also need to make sure members do not lose the benefits they receive with their current fund.

"I think there's also the brand question as well. If the fund that's been merged has a brand now, how will that evolve in the merged environment? Will the brand continue?"

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 23 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 23 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days ago