The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has identified eight red flags which would make it ‘extremely unlikely’ for an investor to gain any advantage from using self-managed super funds (SMSFs) and warned that Australian investors who consider this option should be aware of the potential downside to such a strategy.
The regulator said that SMSFs might be an attractive option for only those investors who wished to have more control over their superannuation investment strategy and who had real skill, care and diligence to manage it.
According to ASIC, SMSFs were not an appropriate investment option for people who wanted a simple superannuation solution and who had a low level of financial literacy.
The remaining potential red flags, identified by ASIC, included:
ASIC Commissioner Danielle Press said, “ASIC believes that consumers are all too well aware of the potential benefits that might stem from using a SMSF, but are not equally alive to the considerable risks and responsibilities that come with the deal.
“SMSFs are not for everyone simply because not everyone can meet the significant time, costs, risks and obligations associated with establishing and running one.”
According to the Australian Tax Office figures, as at 30 June 2019, there were 599,678 SMSFs in Australia holding nearly $748 billion in assets, making total assets held in SMSFs larger than those in either industry ($719 billion) or retail ($626 billion) funds.
Australia's largest super fund has announced its new chief financial officer as the fund prepares for its next phase of growth.
The industry super fund has appointed a new company secretary with extensive governance experience.
The fund has launched a new campaign after finding many older tradies have lacked confidence understanding entitlements and missed pension income.
Unions and the Opposition have raised fresh concerns about APRA and ASIC’s failures amid fallout from First Guardian and Shield.