SMSFs not suitable for everyone

11 October 2019
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has identified eight red flags which would make it ‘extremely unlikely’ for an investor to gain any advantage from using self-managed super funds (SMSFs) and warned that Australian investors who consider this option should be aware of the potential downside to such a strategy.

The regulator said that SMSFs might be an attractive option for only those investors who wished to have more control over their superannuation investment strategy and who had real skill, care and diligence to manage it.

According to ASIC, SMSFs were not an appropriate investment option for people who wanted a simple superannuation solution and who had a low level of financial literacy.

The remaining potential red flags, identified by ASIC, included:

  • the client has a low superannuation balance, and would have a limited ability to make future contributions;
  • the client wants a simple superannuation solution;
  • the client wants to delegate all of the running of the SMSF to a paid advice-provider;
  • the client wants to delegate all of the investment decision making to someone else;
  • the client does not have a lot of time to devote to managing their financial affairs;
  • the client has little experience making investment decisions;
  • the client, or suggested trustee, is an undischarged bankrupt or has been convicted of an offence involving dishonesty (because undischarged bankrupts and persons convicted of an offence involving dishonesty are prohibited from acting as a trustee); and
  • the client has a low level of financial literacy.

ASIC Commissioner Danielle Press said, “ASIC believes that consumers are all too well aware of the potential benefits that might stem from using a SMSF, but are not equally alive to the considerable risks and responsibilities that come with the deal.

“SMSFs are not for everyone simply because not everyone can meet the significant time, costs, risks and obligations associated with establishing and running one.”

According to the Australian Tax Office figures, as at 30 June 2019, there were 599,678 SMSFs in Australia holding nearly $748 billion in assets, making total assets held in SMSFs larger than those in either industry ($719 billion) or retail ($626 billion) funds.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days 7 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days 7 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days 8 hours ago