POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
In-sourcing to cut costs creates HR nightmare
Superannuation funds that in-source investment skills based purely on cost considerations may run into a human resources (HR) nightmare, according to Sunsuper chief investment officer David Hartley.
Hartley said cost considerations were a good reason for larger funds to bring investment expertise in-house as the amount funds spent on external managers could buy a lot of internal expertise.
"On cost basis alone large funds need to at least consider in-sourcing, there's no question about that - the gun is to the head, they're paying a lot of money in base fees, they have to consider it," he said.
But a sole focus on cost-cutting could lead to a "logical disconnect" and high turnover amongst internal managers as they built up expertise, according to Hartley.
He cited the benefits of the Canadian in-sourcing model which he said provided better alignment, improved vision on assets, cash flow control and an ability to ensure cash flows delivered what the fund needed for its members.
Associate professor of the Australian Business School at UNSW, Professor John Evans, said unless a fund had extreme scale, cost savings through in-sourcing were not guaranteed.
He said funds that pursued internal investment models were swapping manager risk for HR risk.
The HR nightmare which could result included difficulty in meeting pay expectations, sourcing the same expertise as found in external managers, and an inability or reluctance to fire internal staff.
He said in-house management did not like to admit when they had got it wrong.
The biggest issue Evans saw with in-sourcing was governance risk. He said funds that transferred skills in-house would immediately encounter insider trading problems.
Super funds governance structure had been set up for very different purposes, he said.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
