POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Stop dumping regulatory costs on consumers: ASFA
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has questioned government's "increasing tendency" to dump regulatory costs on Australian consumers.
It said it appeared government departments were increasingly looking to consumers to wear the brunt of costs.
Government also ignored the direct costs to those entities, according to ASFA, in a submission to the Department of Finance and Deregulation on the Government's cost recovery guidelines. It said further submissions had been raised in regards to Cost Recovery Impact Statements (CRIS) released by AUSTRAC.
It said levies were being put on the public with no supporting material for what public benefit the levy supplied.
"There has been an absence of proper acknowledgment of the direct cost that regulation has already imposed on those entities or due regard for whether the regulation provides a broader public good which is more appropriately funded from consolidated revenue," it said.
ASFA said any charges should reflect the costs of providing the service and should be implemented on a fee-for-service basis, and where required, a levy.
It also said it was important the guidelines did not advocate costs recovery where it was not cost-effective or where it would stifle competition.
ASFA said it was redundant for an agency to develop a Cost Recovery Impact Statement (CRIS) where it has already compiled a Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) that addresses cost recovery arrangements.
It said a compulsory agency review should be periodic, and at a minimum, every five years.
In a separate submission to Treasury, ASFA requested the Government review the term "lost" to describe disengaged or uncontactable members.
"For those members to be approached and told they are 'lost' causes confusion for the member and reputational damage to the fund," it said.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remains the “urgent missing piece” of the puzzle.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
