Weak growth in total superannuation contributions could be the result of leakage from Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)-regulated funds to the self-managed sector and deteriorating economic fundamentals, according to the Financial Services Council (FSC).
A 1.9 per cent growth rate in contributions for the 2012/13 financial year to APRA-regulated funds could be caused by rising unemployment and slower GDP growth, the FSC's latest Bond Report has found.
FSC chief economist James Bond said the rise of self-managed super funds (SMSFs) among high net worths could also be a factor in lower contributions growth driven by a significant drop in employer contributions.
It found total contributions for the June quarter were $112 million (0.4 per cent) less than June 2012, following a decline of $399 million between the March and June quarters.
June saw the lowest levels of employer contributions since the global financial crisis, which added to a $489 million drop between June 2012 and June 2013 (2.4 per cent) and overshadowed a 6.6 per cent increase in employee contributions to $377 million for the year.
"Weak growth in September 2012 and March 2013 have combined with the decline in this quarter to result in weak growth of 1.9 per cent for the last financial year," said Bond.
"Rising unemployment and slowing GDP growth could be the reasons why people are holding back salary sacrificed contributions to their superannuation funds."
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.