POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Super disclosure regime to harm retirement outcomes
The Government’s proposed disclosure requirements for superannuation funds will negatively impact retirement income, according to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).
The disclosure regime, set to come into effect on 31 December, would require super funds to disclose the precise value of privately held assets.
AIST chief executive, Eva Scheerlinck, said while the association supported disclosure on a wide-ranging basis, it needed to be done in a way that did not prejudice members’ best financial interests.
“Requiring super funds to disclose the precise value of privately held assets will compromise their ability to effectively implement investment strategies on behalf of members – members’ retirement outcomes will be harmed,” she said.
“Signalling the precise value of unlisted assets will enable other institutional investors, including overseas buyers including sovereign wealth funds and hedge funds to receive an unfair advantage over Australian super funds. This may risk co-investment opportunities and ultimately may jeopardise Australian jobs and returns to Australian super fund members.
“Unbelievably, the Government would be giving overseas investors a leg up at the expense of Australian fund members.”
AIST said if implemented in its current form, the regime would:
- Give an advantage to foreign buyers (who were not required to disclose specific values) over Australian super funds – this may increase foreign ownership of these assets over time and jeopardise Australian jobs;
- Make Australian super capital less attractive to investment partners and reduces access to investment opportunities;
- Prevent Australian super funds from maximising the sale price when they were selling an unlisted asset as buyers would have information on the vendor’s current carrying value;
- Give foreign buyers an advantage when they were bidding for other assets in the same market as those held by Australian super funds as they would have a clear signal of value;
- Have a negative impact on the carrying value of assets held by Australian State and Federal Governments where interests were held alongside Australian super funds;
- May lead to opportunistic sale approaches with public/shareholder pressure to sell the asset at the disclosed value; and
- Under the proposed derivates disclosure, a hedge fund would be able to use disclosed information against an Australian super fund, adversely effecting pricing and returns.
Recommended for you
Rest has joined forces with alternative asset manager Blue Owl Capital, co-investing in a real estate trust, with the aim of capitalising on systemic changes in debt financing.
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
