Super fintechs may get regulatory breathing space

9 June 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has moved to clear the way for financial services technology start-ups by canvassing a "regulatory sandbox" approach which would allow companies to test certain financial services for six months without holding an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL).

The regulator has canvassed the new approach within an industry consultation paper released this week which substantially reflects the policy approach outlined by the Government before the calling of the 2 July Federal Election.

ASIC has outlined the options it is considering as being:

  • Option 1 — provide additional guidance about how we assess whether a responsible manager has the appropriate knowledge and skills under Option 5 of RG 105 (including what we may consider to be appropriate knowledge and skills);
  • Option 2 — modify our guidance under Option 5 of RG 105 to allow heavily automated (but small-scale) businesses to rely, in part, on sign-off from an appropriately experienced third party in order to meet their organisational competence obligation;
  • Option 3 — provide a conditional, industry-wide exemption to allow new Australian businesses to test certain financial services for six months without holding an AFSL (also referred to as the "regulatory sandbox exemption");
  • Option 4 — a combination of Options 1-3; and
  • Option 5 — maintain the status quo.

Commenting on the options paper, ASIC Commissioner, John Price said the regulator had sought to identify the major obstacles via its so-called innovation hub.

"We believe the measures proposed in this consultation paper will help to lower barriers to entry faced by fintech start-ups by providing cost reductions and promoting efficiency in the provision of financial services whilst maintaining the fundamental principles of the regulatory and licensing framework," he said.

Price said the proposed licensing exemption compared favourably to measures in other jurisdictions as it would allow some fintech businesses to commence testing of certain product offerings in the absence of detailed assessment by the regulator.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

21 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

21 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

22 hours ago