Superannuation funds are squandering critical opportunities to force companies they invest in to step up on climate change, according to Market Forces analysis.
Will van de Pol, Market Forces asset management campaigner, said Market Forces had reviewed the voting records of the seven big super funds that had net zero commitments and who also disclosed their voting within days of an annual general meeting.
Active Super, BT Super, Cbus, HESTA, NGS Super, QSuper and Telstra Super populated the list.
“All but one of those funds voted against two or more key climate-related proposals in Australia since September,” van de Pol said.
“In fact, just 10 of the 32 votes identified were cast in favour of climate action. And given most funds haven’t even disclosed how they voted yet, climate voting records could be even worse across the broader superannuation sector.”
He said super fund members should demand for their super fund to vote for climate action on their behalf, with ANZ, NAB and Westpac all facing Market Forces backed shareholder votes urging them to stop funding expansion of the fossil fuel industry.
“All funds should vote in favour of these resolutions, especially those with their own net zero commitments,” he said.
“We have a chance to turn this around in the next few weeks. But we need to speak up now.”
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.