Super funds face multi-million-dollar costs

19 June 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

It could cost some superannuation funds millions of dollars to implement new information security management standards being proposed by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to maintain them.

That is the cautionary note being sounded to APRA by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), which has told the regulator it has received anecdotal evidence from its members which suggests that “there would be significant one-off and recurrent costs in changing oversight and monitoring, reporting and other systems” resulting from the new requirements.

“One fund has estimated that the initial cost would be $3.2 million and the recurrent annual cost would be $500,000,” ASFA said.

It used a submission to APRA to state that the other consideration is that the detail for some of the requirements is not yet clear or available and it is therefore difficult to be definitive about the likely costs.

However, the ASFA submission said the organisation generally supported the introduction of a new prudential standard to strengthen the existing information security requirements for RSE licensees and welcomed any initiative that would help to protect member information.

It said a common observation made by its members was that it would take time to work out the practical effect of the new requirements and consequently it was difficult to estimate their impact on RSE licensees’ systems and resourcing.

“We have received some cost estimates from members which suggest that there will be significant immediate and recurrent costs,” ASFA said. “While this of itself provides no reason to question the proposal we urge APRA to consider the costs involved in conforming with the new information security regime and to minimise the impact wherever possible.”

“ASFA also recommends that consideration be given to the proposed compliance deadlines and that either flexibility or a staggered approach be adopted. A number of our members have suggested that the proposed timeframes will be difficult to achieve, particularly where third or related parties are involved.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 4 months ago

Both economists and money markets have scaled back expectations of a jumbo rate cut in May....

3 hours 31 minutes ago

Negative market movements, coupled with net outflows, have prompted a near $6 billion decline in Challenger’s funds under management (FUM) for FY2024–25’s third quarter....

3 hours 35 minutes ago

Momentum Media’s wealth publishing network – comprising InvestorDaily, ifa, SMSF Adviser, Money Management, and Super Review – is proud to launch the annual Australian We...

3 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND