Super funds hamstrung within tax treaties

14 August 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The tax treaties entered into by Australia are not always providing an adequate benefit to the nation's superannuation funds, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

In a submission to the Treasury on Australia's tax treaty negotiation program, the ASFA submission said that for many of the organisation's large superannuation fund members, one of the more significant practical aspects of implementation of Australia's tax treaties was that a number of

jurisdictions were not willing to accept that Australian superannuation funds are beneficial owners of income entitled to treaty benefits.

It said that as a result of this stance, these countries would not accept a Certificate of Residency from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) as sufficient documentation to enable a superannuation fund to claim the benefits of the treaty.

In doing so, the ASFA submission cited Taiwan and Korea as having proved problematic.

The submission said that ASFA was also concerned that as superannuation funds expanded their direct offshore investment portfolios, many more examples would arise of "these practical difficulties which act as barriers to Australian superannuation funds obtaining benefits under Australia's treaties".

"In addition, Australian income tax legislation operates such that, strictly, the maximum foreign income tax offset (FITO) is limited to the treaty rate (even if in practice, this treaty rate is difficult or very costly to obtain)," it said. "This means that no FITO is available for any withholding tax that exceeds the treaty rate. In these circumstances, the Australian superannuation fund actually incurs higher total taxes on dividend income from these jurisdictions than on the equivalent dividend income from a jurisdiction with which Australia has no treaty."

The ASFA submission suggested that when negotiating tax treaties with other countries the circumstances of Australian superannuation funds needed to be specifically addressed.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days 13 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days 13 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days 14 hours ago