Superannuation funds could control more than half the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) within 15 years, with the portion it holds in ASX-listed domestic equities experiencing faster growth than market capitalisation of the Exchange.
Super funds currently held almost 40 per cent of the ASX, representing $700 billion, with an increase of 6.7 per cent over the past five years and 9.4 per cent over the past decade. Should this holding continue its current growth of one per cent per year, in 10 years ownership levels would be 50 per cent, and in 20 years, 60 per cent.
According to Rainmaker Information, not for profit super funds accounted for just under half of the industry’s total ownership of ASX stocks, retail funds one quarter, and self-managed super funds (SMSFs) 27 per cent. Further, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) regulated funds held an estimated 20 per cent of the banking sector, with the inclusion of SMSFs potentially bringing that to one third.
The most popular companies for super funds were led by CSL, followed by NAB, Westpac, ANZ, BHP Billiton, Commonwealth Bank, Wesfarmers, Macquarie Group, Woolworths, and Telstra.
These companies could have to get used to having larger, more interested investors should super funds become their dominant shareholders, executive director of research at Rainmaker, Alex Dunnin, said.
“While this may challenge some companies that are not used to dealing with larger, active investors, the upside is that this new dynamic will lower the cost of capital for these companies and will actually help them expand their growth opportunities,” he added.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
It is the pension/superannuation funds and insurance companies that push up stock markets which are overvalued everywhere by traditional valuation measures. They provide the downside support. They necessarily have to invest their continuous flow of funds somewhere and where other than stock markets? If markets falls to their fair values, based on their earnings and return on capital employed, it would be disastrous to the pensioners and insurance policy holders. It is crucial that anybody invests in stock markets based exclusively on intrinsic valuation, based on normalized interest rates, and earnings. Not out of lack of other investment opportunities.