Super funds need to consider unique target member outcomes

12 September 2019
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

When superannuation funds conduct their business performance review during March to May 2020, as per the new member outcomes requirement, they should not lose sight of considering their unique target member outcomes, Rice Warner believes.

In an analysis surrounding the new SIS Act requirements, the research house said the new member outcomes was the biggest game changer for trustees as it determined whether the financial interests of members who held each product offered by the fund were being promoted by the trustee, with specific reference to comparable products offered by other super funds.

“In assessing the outcomes achieved for members relative to the outcomes being achieved by other superannuation funds, trustees need to consider not whether the fund is doing the best it can by its members, but whether that best is good enough,” it said.

Rice Warner pointed to the fact that the Australian Prudential and Regulation Authority (APRA) clarified that they would initially focus on MySuper products with assessments on investment returns, fees and charges, sustainability, and in due course insurance.

“The initial exclusion of insurance may be frustrating given that the SIS Act requires trustees to benchmark the fund’s insurance offers against peers in the outcomes assessment, but highlights the lack of readily available data,” Rice Warner said.

“While we would agree that additional transparency regarding the performance of all superannuation funds is to be valued, we caution that funds should not lose sight of the need for the business performance review to consider the fund’s unique target member outcomes.

“This should not entrench any existing assessment of funds into league tables. Ultimately, the member outcomes process asks each fund to think critically about what outcomes the fund is aiming to achieve for its members and how the fund’s business plan supports this.”

Rice Warner said it was not a one size fits all approach in which all funds aimed to deliver the same outcomes and service proposition, and in which the only differentiating factors were having the lowest fees and the highest past investment performance.

“While these most recent announcements have delayed the implementation of member outcomes with respect to Choice products, we encourage funds to push on with their implementation of this new work,” it said.

“Many funds are well progressed and regardless of prudential and legislative delays have incorporated member outcomes into the current year business plan and will be assessing performance against target member outcomes throughout FY20.

“Once the marketplace has settled, we expect the bar will have been raised to acceptable levels throughout the industry, and the industry can move beyond all the recent criticism.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

10 months 2 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

10 months 3 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

10 months 3 weeks ago

The superannuation industry will be judged by its member services rather than how effectively it accumulates wealth, according to Stephen Jones....

17 hours ago

APRA’s latest data has revealed that superannuation funds spent $1.3 billion on advice fees, with the vast majority sent to external financial advisers....

17 hours ago

The profit-to-member super funds are officially operating as a merged entity, set to serve over half a million members. ...

3 days 16 hours ago