Superannuation fund trustee/directors need to take greater account of carbon risks in their investment decisions, according to Norwegian chair of the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), Martin Skancke.
Speaking during a panel discussion at the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia annual conference, in Brisbane, Skancke said that climate change could not be ignored as an investment issue and that mispricing was occurring in circumstances where no one owned the atmosphere but it was being used by everyone to store CO2.
He said this in turn created a very misleading picture of many of the companies in which super funds chose to invest in because it was sending a very wrong price signal to the companies themselves.
Skancke said that funds needed to factor in the risk to those carbon-related companies that their positions will be significantly affected when governments finally reach a viable policy position.
"We have a carbon-based energy system that is unsustainable in its present form," he said.
Skancke said that, ultimately, the risks flowing from exposure to carbon fuels would impact more than just the direct investors and there was a need for investors to factor in what they would ultimately to.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.