POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Super members don’t need 41,000 investment options
There are too many investment options in superannuation and members do not need nor want to much choice, according to Rice Warner.
The research house’s latest analysis said that as of 30 June 2016, Australian superannuants had access to over 41,000 investment options. This has stemmed from the aim to give members the ability to tailor their asset strategy and provide the means to effect niche investment preferences.
Rice Warner noted that many members were disengaged but many more might be content to belong to a fund which gave a five per cent real return over 25 years.
“This begs the question; do the consumers of the superannuation sector need or even want this choice? Rice Warner’s Super Insights database suggests the answer may be no,” the analysis said.
It said 85 per cent of industry fund members did not elect an investment choice, and of the remaining 15 per cent the clear majority were invested in one of four pre-mixed options.
It found that the concentration of investments across a small number of options was true even in the retail fund sector, where choice and financial advice was more prevalent.
“As a result, it stands to reason that even members who are acting on complex tailored advice are largely serviced by a small handful of investment options,” Rice Warner said.
“Overall this suggests that even in a high choice environment, members do not utilise the full suite of choices which are made available.”
Rice Warner also noted that funds should consider scaling back the number of options available and said a revised menu could be designed to provide:
- A sensible default for all members more than five years from retirement;
- A tailored default for those transitioning into retirement or on pension;
- Premixed options with suitable growth profiles (say five);
- A small set of sector-based options (say five); and
- Niche options like socially responsible investments (SRI), Indexed strategies or member direct investments (MDI) chosen to suit fund membership (recognising that the small take-up rates will require a cross-subsidy from other members).
It said this smaller subset would allow members to customise their asset allocations or replicate strategies without overwhelming them with too many choices.
“In the context of an industry focused on member engagement and a regulator aiming to shut down inefficient funds, it is timely for funds to rethink their investment strategies and to provide solutions (investment menus) that are better tailored to member needs and behaviours,” it said.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
41,000 + what a load of hogwash. At least remove the duplication from different superannuation products offering ASX 300 listed shares as an investment option. Not to mention most menus have the same UUT offering. Neither would be considered niche.
There seem to be a lot of consultants, investment specialists attached to some if not all of the option suites. Reduction in the numbers of these suites would, I assume, mean a reduction by most funds in fees charged to superannuation accounts?