Super needed to help navigate out of economic crisis

20 August 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

“Do not let anti-retirement groups dismantle superannuation on ideological grounds which will shrink the economy”, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia has warned.

ASFA said super needed to be allowed to navigate the country out of the economic crisis brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Super, it said, underpinned the economy by investing heavily in productivity boosting assets.

ASFA deputy chief executive, Glen McCrea, said: “The challenge we face is that there are a range of self-interest groups who are obsessed with dismantling superannuation on ideological grounds, thereby shrinking the economy – despite the evidence that Australia’s retirement system is the envy of the modern world.

“We need to allow superannuation to help Australia out of this crisis; don’t let anti-retirement groups shrink people’s future and our fragile economy.”

ASFA’s latest report found that $350 billion (or nearly 20% of total assets in Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)-regulated superannuation funds) was invested in unlisted assets, including infrastructure assets such as airports, roads and ports and energy assets such as the largest wind farm in the southern hemisphere.

It also found that super was investing in affordable housing across Australia for those key workers currently saving lives, such as nurses, police and emergency workers, and investing in hospitals, medical research and devices such as needle-free vaccines.

“As an investor, superannuation is in it for the long haul, not looking to make a quick buck at someone else’s expense,” McCrea said.

“The savings mobilised by superannuation funds facilitate a long-term approach to investing. Super funds provide ‘patient’ capital for assets classes that are critical to Australia’s long-term growth, economic productivity and higher living standards.

“In the absence of super’s long-term investment outlook, many essential assets may not offer a high enough rate of return to attract the required funding. Indeed, some projects might not go ahead at all.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days 20 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days 20 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

2 days 21 hours ago