Super no longer a wealth transfer mechanism

28 November 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Government appears to have substantially achieved its goal of limiting the degree to which superannuation can be used for wealth transfer, according to the Financial Services Council (FSC).

In a year-end wrap-up of policy events in the superannuation industry, the FSC’s senior policy manager for superannuation, Blake Briggs said the Government’s objective had been delivered as a result of the 2016 and 2017 Federal Budget processes.

Writing in the latest print edition of Super Review, Briggs said that while the 2017 Budget was perhaps the most substantial package of superannuation tax reforms since the 2016 Budget, the collective outcome had been substantial.

“Collectively, however, the Government has achieved its goal of materially limiting the extent to which superannuation can be used for wealth transfer,” he said.

Briggs noted that the Government had committed to no further changes in the life of the Turnbull Government -  a promise matched by Shadow Treasurer, Chris Bowen.

However, he said the net result had been an unprecedented increase in the complexity of the system.

“Uncertainty also stems from multiple Budget measures yet to be legislated, such as the first home buyer saving scheme, which consumers can conceivably already make contributions towards but is not yet the law of the land,” Briggs said. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Debbie Whiting on Tue, 11/28/2017 - 12:45

What a load of rubbish! The government has not closed off the wealth transfer. A 65 year old person who had $30m in their super fund before all these ridiculous changes, had to draw 5% of the value of the fund as a pension ie $1.5m. Now they only need to draw 5% of $1.6m or $80k and they can leave the rest in their fund until they die. Tax can be completely avoided with the right tactical asset allocation.
The government has created the very estate planning vehicle it was seeking to prevent. The cost of this nonsense is the complete undermining of the superannuation system. The aged pension will not be available for most people. NO future government can afford it.. All governments should be giving tax incentives to middle income earners to be self funded retirees so it can fund the really needy.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 8 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 9 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 9 months ago

The deputy governor has warned that, as super funds’ overseas assets grow and liquidity risks rise, they will need to expand their FX hedge books to manage currency expos...

30 seconds hence

Super funds have built on early financial year momentum, as growth funds deliver strong results driven by equities and resilient bonds....

22 hours 19 minutes ago

The super fund has announced that Mark Rider will step down from his position of chief investment officer (CIO) after deciding to “semi-retire” from full-time work. ...

22 hours 21 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND